If you like free things but care about the planet then this is the website for you.
Packed with gorgeous, green giveaways and cool, ethical competitions, Ethical Goodies has been launched recently as a single online venue where organisations and businesses could post their competitions and free draws.
Recently reviewed in the Guardian, a visit to the site can currently net you a £500 voucher for a holiday courtesy of the Natural Collection, a rotary mobile phone charger from Lake Renewables, over £300 worth of beauty booty from Style Will Save Us, and many other goodies.
At the time of writing, there were 28 different competitions and giveaways on the site so there should be something that will interest you.
For businesses there's good news too as Ethical Goodies do not charge to list competitions or giveaways!
www.ethicalgoodies.co.uk
Monday, August 06, 2007
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Wasted Energy - Mutual Frustrations
By Peter Hale of Climate Concern UK
I know some say we should think positively and avoid "No", but those of us trying to do our bit to save energy might as well feel some togetherness in our frustration at other people's lack of concern, instead of suffering alone!
OK, we mustn't spoil everybody's fun and I remain guilty myself of driving too many miles, but below are other examples of high energy consumption which work against our own individual efforts and currently bother me!: (send me your own frustrations to circulate).
Hot shops and supermarkets: (not to mention overheated offices, schools and hotels). My number one long-standing frustration. Why do they think they need to heat stores in the winter to the temperature of our front rooms, when we enter wearing coats and move around? Their staff can wear fleeces. And apart from wasting energy and making the fridges all work harder, it must reduce the life of all the food products. I have commented to some of the large store Energy Managers - at least Tesco say they have reduced their target from 21C to 19C.
Water jet pressure washers: A neighbour was out recently jetting every square inch of his long concrete drive, in several sessions for hours at a time - surely a great waste of water and energy. And I spoke to a chap the other day who cleans drives in this way for other people as a business. Is all this concrete cleaning necessary?!
Extra-cold drinks: or "the coldest beer in town". This energy guzzling trend, strongly marketed by the breweries, is especially galling to me because beer (bitter) as I like it - a bit warm - is now virtually unobtainable. And it's supposed to be an English trait!
Over-cooled trains: It is common to experience uncomfortably cold coaches on modern multiple-unit trains, along with cold draughts from overhead. (Express trains, such as GNER and Virgin, seem to operate at comfortable temperatures). The air conditioning to achieve these excessively low temperatures represents an enormous waste of energy. It appears that individual drivers control the cooling - there needs to be a higher minimum limit set. I am currently trying, with difficulty, to make contact with the right people at the train operators. Anybody on a rail users' focus group?
Excessive Business Travel: I spoke to a woman employee of "Candy King" pick-and-mix sweets, who was in the process of filling a stand at Sainsbury's in my local town of Northallerton, north of York. She was visiting just two stores that day, having driven from her home in Lancashire - the other side of the country. When I suggested that the 200 mile return trip seemed a bit out of proportion, her reply was "Oh, I enjoy it". No wonder pick-and-mix are expensive!
Motorhomes: I spoke with a couple the other day who turned up in their little "Smart" car - I thought: "perhaps they're eco-minded". They then mentioned that its main purpose is to be towed around Europe on a trailer behind their motorhome - which does 17 mpg! (There are apparently motorhome shows and gatherings - some with entertainments - all over the country and Europe). The husband turned out to be a well-informed climate sceptic with all the arguments. (Incidentally, I don't recall ever having come across a sceptic who believes it is more likely that global warming isn't caused by our emissions - they always know that it isn't!).
Sports travel excesses: I'm not anti-sport and follow football a bit myself, but we seem to hear little about the extreme travel involved in sports events, some of it avoidable - e.g. a football final held three years ago in Manchester between two Italian clubs! A Leeds United supporter said on the radio that he regularly drives 440 miles return from the south to see home matches. I have spoken with people at two of the clubs claiming to be green, e.g. planning wind turbines - Manchester City and Middlesbrough - they didn't have much to say when I asked if there were efforts to get more fans out of their cars and into coaches.
Freezer temperatures: My own father mentioned that his chest freezer in the garage is set at -30C! And that he doesn't de-frost it. How many fridges and freezers are set far too low out of ignorance of suitable settings? The normally recommended temperatures are: fridge 0C to +3C; freezer -16C to -18C. Thermometers are available at kitchen/DIY stores (ours from Homebase).
Digital Radio on TV: Apparently, millions of people listen to the radio through their power-hungry digital televisions. The power consumption of a modern TV when switched on for radio reception is approx 120 Watts. A typical digital radio takes 8 Watts; a conventional radio 2 Watts!
Truckfests: I keep seeing signs around the country for these - what on earth?!
Exhibitions/Shows: When attending regional exhibitions and hobby-type shows, I am struck by the distances some people travel, not only to visit, but also to take and fetch back exhibits before and after the show, some of them to my mind very minor items. But now perhaps I'm going too far - I've done the same myself!
I'd better stop.
Climate Concern UK
tel 01325 378452
www.climate-concern.com
www.climate-speakers.org.uk
I know some say we should think positively and avoid "No", but those of us trying to do our bit to save energy might as well feel some togetherness in our frustration at other people's lack of concern, instead of suffering alone!
OK, we mustn't spoil everybody's fun and I remain guilty myself of driving too many miles, but below are other examples of high energy consumption which work against our own individual efforts and currently bother me!: (send me your own frustrations to circulate).
Hot shops and supermarkets: (not to mention overheated offices, schools and hotels). My number one long-standing frustration. Why do they think they need to heat stores in the winter to the temperature of our front rooms, when we enter wearing coats and move around? Their staff can wear fleeces. And apart from wasting energy and making the fridges all work harder, it must reduce the life of all the food products. I have commented to some of the large store Energy Managers - at least Tesco say they have reduced their target from 21C to 19C.
Water jet pressure washers: A neighbour was out recently jetting every square inch of his long concrete drive, in several sessions for hours at a time - surely a great waste of water and energy. And I spoke to a chap the other day who cleans drives in this way for other people as a business. Is all this concrete cleaning necessary?!
Extra-cold drinks: or "the coldest beer in town". This energy guzzling trend, strongly marketed by the breweries, is especially galling to me because beer (bitter) as I like it - a bit warm - is now virtually unobtainable. And it's supposed to be an English trait!
Over-cooled trains: It is common to experience uncomfortably cold coaches on modern multiple-unit trains, along with cold draughts from overhead. (Express trains, such as GNER and Virgin, seem to operate at comfortable temperatures). The air conditioning to achieve these excessively low temperatures represents an enormous waste of energy. It appears that individual drivers control the cooling - there needs to be a higher minimum limit set. I am currently trying, with difficulty, to make contact with the right people at the train operators. Anybody on a rail users' focus group?
Excessive Business Travel: I spoke to a woman employee of "Candy King" pick-and-mix sweets, who was in the process of filling a stand at Sainsbury's in my local town of Northallerton, north of York. She was visiting just two stores that day, having driven from her home in Lancashire - the other side of the country. When I suggested that the 200 mile return trip seemed a bit out of proportion, her reply was "Oh, I enjoy it". No wonder pick-and-mix are expensive!
Motorhomes: I spoke with a couple the other day who turned up in their little "Smart" car - I thought: "perhaps they're eco-minded". They then mentioned that its main purpose is to be towed around Europe on a trailer behind their motorhome - which does 17 mpg! (There are apparently motorhome shows and gatherings - some with entertainments - all over the country and Europe). The husband turned out to be a well-informed climate sceptic with all the arguments. (Incidentally, I don't recall ever having come across a sceptic who believes it is more likely that global warming isn't caused by our emissions - they always know that it isn't!).
Sports travel excesses: I'm not anti-sport and follow football a bit myself, but we seem to hear little about the extreme travel involved in sports events, some of it avoidable - e.g. a football final held three years ago in Manchester between two Italian clubs! A Leeds United supporter said on the radio that he regularly drives 440 miles return from the south to see home matches. I have spoken with people at two of the clubs claiming to be green, e.g. planning wind turbines - Manchester City and Middlesbrough - they didn't have much to say when I asked if there were efforts to get more fans out of their cars and into coaches.
Freezer temperatures: My own father mentioned that his chest freezer in the garage is set at -30C! And that he doesn't de-frost it. How many fridges and freezers are set far too low out of ignorance of suitable settings? The normally recommended temperatures are: fridge 0C to +3C; freezer -16C to -18C. Thermometers are available at kitchen/DIY stores (ours from Homebase).
Digital Radio on TV: Apparently, millions of people listen to the radio through their power-hungry digital televisions. The power consumption of a modern TV when switched on for radio reception is approx 120 Watts. A typical digital radio takes 8 Watts; a conventional radio 2 Watts!
Truckfests: I keep seeing signs around the country for these - what on earth?!
Exhibitions/Shows: When attending regional exhibitions and hobby-type shows, I am struck by the distances some people travel, not only to visit, but also to take and fetch back exhibits before and after the show, some of them to my mind very minor items. But now perhaps I'm going too far - I've done the same myself!
I'd better stop.
Climate Concern UK
tel 01325 378452
www.climate-concern.com
www.climate-speakers.org.uk
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Addressing consumer demand for ethical goods and global supply chains
What is the cost to workers as the demand grows for cheap but fashionable products?
Tom Barnett, Director of Ethical Junction (www.ethical-junction.org), looks at what it means to produce ethical goods and if the demand amongst consumers really exists.
“Ethical” is fast becoming a brand name – a cleansing agent that can be strapped to a product or service to alleviate the guilt of consumption. Does it mean that the mythical ethical consumer is emerging, a consumer who tries to act and buy ethically in all aspects of their life? Or does there simply exist a growing demand for “ethical” products? For the two are not the same.
The Co-op’s latest annual “Ethical consumerism” report now shows that the ethical sector in 2005 was worth £29.268 billion, a growth of 11% on 2004 exceeded the sales of ‘over-the-counter’ beer and cigarettes. Whichever way you look at it, something is changing amongst consumers.
The hidden ingredients
Recent legislation in the food industry introduced universal food labelling; specific ingredients, whose quantities must be revealed are clearly listed on all food sold from the shelves of our supermarkets. Now we know exactly what we are putting into our bodies and if we choose to, we can make better educated decisions about our diets. Suddenly it makes sense why my Mum banned me from drinking Ribena all those years ago. The labels show clearly what has physically gone in to the product: salt, sugar, fat and protein. Of course, there is more to it than they can display, but it is a vast improvement on the rather cryptic link between Coca-cola and some of its original ingredients. But what about everything else that went in to producing that product? Where are the raw materials sourced from? In what conditions are they grown, mined, raised, fished and processed? What about the number of miles it travelled to get on the shelf? What about what the producer does with the money? What about the “ethics” that brought that product to market?
What is ethical?
Ethical practice is about more that just fair-trade, it is more than organic, it involves holistic appraisal of every aspect that goes into the trade and industry behind a product or service, in Marxist terms it is the “means of production and distribution”. There is no one definition for “ethical”, as an adjective it’s very nature is open to interpretation, although there is no doubt that to be ethically led means to be trying to “do the right thing” at all points of the supply chain. As of yet, however, the consumer cannot easily get a fair appraisal of the ethics that lie within and behind a product as easily as they can find the ingredients that lie within it. So the question must be: Do consumers really know in what proportions they are demanding “ethical”?
What measures the ethical quality of a product? Minimal environmental impact? I think so. Respect for fellow living creatures? Probably. Fair treatment of all labour involved in the production process? Definitely. So the key to a truly ethical product lies in the production process and the “worker” is core to that as we are, mercifully, not entirely mechanised yet. It would be fair to say then, based on ethical demand requiring suppliers to adhere to these practices, the worker is going to come off quite well. Fair wages, workers rights and limits on the amount of hours worked are just some of the benefits available. However, we haven't addressed price yet.
Addressing the price
Price, whilst the least tangible of all costs that we can relate to a product, is more often than not, the deciding factor in the relative success of any product or service. Price, traditionally, drives both demand and supply. Price as a financial measure is ultimately a measure of the relative cost of a product. It is a generic summary of the resources that have been consumed bringing the product to market; it is not necessarily related to or indicative of the “ethical” cost of a product. Waitrose now boasts that its products are “honestly priced” and, in case you hadn't noticed, their locally produced organic products are not cheap.
Organic food will probably always be more expensive than non-organic, the animals have more space and the intense battery and shed systems are banned; the avoidance of pesticides and chemical fertilisers means that more human labour needs to be utilised for the same kilo of production so organic farmers will always have to charge more, until of course the full environmental cost of agri-chemicals becomes factored into industrial farming by legislation. Fairtade coffee on the other hand is very different, in non-Fairtrade coffee the amount paid to the grower of the beans makes up a mere 7% of the total cost, for Fairtrade coffee including the minimum price and the social premium this rises but to only 11%. Yet this small rise is not reflected in the increased cost of Fairtrade coffee over non-Fairtrade, why? When the Co-op first introduced Fairtrade coffee into its range, it had a 1p difference in price from the rest of its coffee range. One conclusion to draw is that some of the traditional large retailers are cashing in on ethical consumerism to increase their margins.
Take the cost of two different tomatoes; one is 20p, the other 35p – one is from Africa the other is from Somerset. One was bought from Tesco Express, the other from an independently run local produce shop. One is sprayed in pesticides; the other has been exposed to the elements. One was grown on land that is patrolled by thugs and funded by a bank you have never heard of; the other was grown in a field about two miles north of Hove in a farmers field whose family had owned it for generations. The food labels, if tomatoes carried such things, would be identical. It’s the “Tale of Two Tomatoes” and if they had ethical labelling they would read very differently indeed.
Does ethical demand really exist?
So perhaps, as with the latest food labelling laws, the public need to be exposed to a standardised measure of the ethical costs of a product, or should we say the ethical compromises made to ensure that it could be successful according to its derived financial price. We can then see if ethical demand really exists. If effective ethical demand really does exist it will not be price driven, it will driven by the other costs normally associated with supply. Fashion too would be relative to what was achievable within ethical parameters, not simply within the realms of possibility.
What can I do about it?
At Ethical Junction we believe that ethical demand does exist. But, like the fundamental economic problem, it is not a perfect world. Moving in the right direction is all anyone can do to create an ethically driven supply and demand chain – lots and lots of tiny steps in the right direction – millions of consecutive ethically driven decisions that help to shape the economy. And this can only be done if we co-operate.
Ethical Junction represents more than one thousand enterprises that have signed up to do just this – which is move in the same ethically guided direction. Choosing an Ethical Junction member as a supplier helps build the chain and consequently feeds into the development of core ethical principles held by thousands of people.
Ethical Junction (www.ethical-junction.org) is a not-for-profit community interest company that has established itself as the UK’s leading network of ethical businesses. Ethical Junction was established in 1999 and has an active network of over 1,100 companies and organisations that operate ethically and provide a range of goods and services which are environmentally friendly, sustainable, fairly traded and socially responsible.
Tom Barnett, Director of Ethical Junction (www.ethical-junction.org), looks at what it means to produce ethical goods and if the demand amongst consumers really exists.
“Ethical” is fast becoming a brand name – a cleansing agent that can be strapped to a product or service to alleviate the guilt of consumption. Does it mean that the mythical ethical consumer is emerging, a consumer who tries to act and buy ethically in all aspects of their life? Or does there simply exist a growing demand for “ethical” products? For the two are not the same.
The Co-op’s latest annual “Ethical consumerism” report now shows that the ethical sector in 2005 was worth £29.268 billion, a growth of 11% on 2004 exceeded the sales of ‘over-the-counter’ beer and cigarettes. Whichever way you look at it, something is changing amongst consumers.
The hidden ingredients
Recent legislation in the food industry introduced universal food labelling; specific ingredients, whose quantities must be revealed are clearly listed on all food sold from the shelves of our supermarkets. Now we know exactly what we are putting into our bodies and if we choose to, we can make better educated decisions about our diets. Suddenly it makes sense why my Mum banned me from drinking Ribena all those years ago. The labels show clearly what has physically gone in to the product: salt, sugar, fat and protein. Of course, there is more to it than they can display, but it is a vast improvement on the rather cryptic link between Coca-cola and some of its original ingredients. But what about everything else that went in to producing that product? Where are the raw materials sourced from? In what conditions are they grown, mined, raised, fished and processed? What about the number of miles it travelled to get on the shelf? What about what the producer does with the money? What about the “ethics” that brought that product to market?
What is ethical?
Ethical practice is about more that just fair-trade, it is more than organic, it involves holistic appraisal of every aspect that goes into the trade and industry behind a product or service, in Marxist terms it is the “means of production and distribution”. There is no one definition for “ethical”, as an adjective it’s very nature is open to interpretation, although there is no doubt that to be ethically led means to be trying to “do the right thing” at all points of the supply chain. As of yet, however, the consumer cannot easily get a fair appraisal of the ethics that lie within and behind a product as easily as they can find the ingredients that lie within it. So the question must be: Do consumers really know in what proportions they are demanding “ethical”?
What measures the ethical quality of a product? Minimal environmental impact? I think so. Respect for fellow living creatures? Probably. Fair treatment of all labour involved in the production process? Definitely. So the key to a truly ethical product lies in the production process and the “worker” is core to that as we are, mercifully, not entirely mechanised yet. It would be fair to say then, based on ethical demand requiring suppliers to adhere to these practices, the worker is going to come off quite well. Fair wages, workers rights and limits on the amount of hours worked are just some of the benefits available. However, we haven't addressed price yet.
Addressing the price
Price, whilst the least tangible of all costs that we can relate to a product, is more often than not, the deciding factor in the relative success of any product or service. Price, traditionally, drives both demand and supply. Price as a financial measure is ultimately a measure of the relative cost of a product. It is a generic summary of the resources that have been consumed bringing the product to market; it is not necessarily related to or indicative of the “ethical” cost of a product. Waitrose now boasts that its products are “honestly priced” and, in case you hadn't noticed, their locally produced organic products are not cheap.
Organic food will probably always be more expensive than non-organic, the animals have more space and the intense battery and shed systems are banned; the avoidance of pesticides and chemical fertilisers means that more human labour needs to be utilised for the same kilo of production so organic farmers will always have to charge more, until of course the full environmental cost of agri-chemicals becomes factored into industrial farming by legislation. Fairtade coffee on the other hand is very different, in non-Fairtrade coffee the amount paid to the grower of the beans makes up a mere 7% of the total cost, for Fairtrade coffee including the minimum price and the social premium this rises but to only 11%. Yet this small rise is not reflected in the increased cost of Fairtrade coffee over non-Fairtrade, why? When the Co-op first introduced Fairtrade coffee into its range, it had a 1p difference in price from the rest of its coffee range. One conclusion to draw is that some of the traditional large retailers are cashing in on ethical consumerism to increase their margins.
Take the cost of two different tomatoes; one is 20p, the other 35p – one is from Africa the other is from Somerset. One was bought from Tesco Express, the other from an independently run local produce shop. One is sprayed in pesticides; the other has been exposed to the elements. One was grown on land that is patrolled by thugs and funded by a bank you have never heard of; the other was grown in a field about two miles north of Hove in a farmers field whose family had owned it for generations. The food labels, if tomatoes carried such things, would be identical. It’s the “Tale of Two Tomatoes” and if they had ethical labelling they would read very differently indeed.
Does ethical demand really exist?
So perhaps, as with the latest food labelling laws, the public need to be exposed to a standardised measure of the ethical costs of a product, or should we say the ethical compromises made to ensure that it could be successful according to its derived financial price. We can then see if ethical demand really exists. If effective ethical demand really does exist it will not be price driven, it will driven by the other costs normally associated with supply. Fashion too would be relative to what was achievable within ethical parameters, not simply within the realms of possibility.
What can I do about it?
At Ethical Junction we believe that ethical demand does exist. But, like the fundamental economic problem, it is not a perfect world. Moving in the right direction is all anyone can do to create an ethically driven supply and demand chain – lots and lots of tiny steps in the right direction – millions of consecutive ethically driven decisions that help to shape the economy. And this can only be done if we co-operate.
Ethical Junction represents more than one thousand enterprises that have signed up to do just this – which is move in the same ethically guided direction. Choosing an Ethical Junction member as a supplier helps build the chain and consequently feeds into the development of core ethical principles held by thousands of people.
Ethical Junction (www.ethical-junction.org) is a not-for-profit community interest company that has established itself as the UK’s leading network of ethical businesses. Ethical Junction was established in 1999 and has an active network of over 1,100 companies and organisations that operate ethically and provide a range of goods and services which are environmentally friendly, sustainable, fairly traded and socially responsible.
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
less food more work please
I am a bit taken aback, though I guess I shouldn't be surprised, when I see what the G8 talking shop actually comprises. Here (from the official website) is the schedule from G8:
The G8 Heads of State and Government will be meeting in Heiligendamm from 11 a.m. on Wednesday. The programme begins at 7.10 p.m. with a reception and an informal dinner for the G8 Heads of State and Government and their partners. In their first working session on Thursday the Heads of State and Government will be discussing economic growth and responsibility in the global economy. After a first family photo, the Heads of State and Government will meet young people from the J8 summit around midday. The boys and girls have spent the past few days discussing the issues on the G8 agenda at their own summit. During a working lunch the G8 will talk about current foreign policy issues. These will include the conflict in the Middle East and nuclear non-proliferation. Problems concerning Kosovo and Sudan are also on the agenda. The afternoon working session will be dealing with climate change and energy efficiency. A working dinner will be focussing on the G8 Africa Policy. Friday, 8 June will begin with a working session between the G8 Heads of State and Government and the Heads of State and Government of various African countries. The focus will be on the G8 Africa Reform Partnership. Following that, a meeting has been time-tabled with the Heads of State and Government of the so-called emerging economies, namely Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa. Growth and responsibility in the global economy and climate change will be discussed. The working lunch that rounds off the summit will be dedicated to the most important international organisations. The Secretary General of the UN and the Vice-President of the World Bank, among others, are expected to attend.
Can you believe it (of course you can) Africa policy gets a whole“working dinner” worth of discussion! Bound to end world poverty with that then eh? Is there anyone else out there who finds it somewhat distasteful that so much business will be carried out over food when the focus of the discussion involves millions starving? Has anyone ever had a successful "working" breakfast/lunch/dinner where policy really took primacy??? Answers on a postcard please
Also, while asking difficult questions, here's one. How do we find out whether any of the food consumed at the G8 summit is FAIR TRADE food. I'd love to know!!!! Really, let's think about how we can find this out!
The G8 Heads of State and Government will be meeting in Heiligendamm from 11 a.m. on Wednesday. The programme begins at 7.10 p.m. with a reception and an informal dinner for the G8 Heads of State and Government and their partners. In their first working session on Thursday the Heads of State and Government will be discussing economic growth and responsibility in the global economy. After a first family photo, the Heads of State and Government will meet young people from the J8 summit around midday. The boys and girls have spent the past few days discussing the issues on the G8 agenda at their own summit. During a working lunch the G8 will talk about current foreign policy issues. These will include the conflict in the Middle East and nuclear non-proliferation. Problems concerning Kosovo and Sudan are also on the agenda. The afternoon working session will be dealing with climate change and energy efficiency. A working dinner will be focussing on the G8 Africa Policy. Friday, 8 June will begin with a working session between the G8 Heads of State and Government and the Heads of State and Government of various African countries. The focus will be on the G8 Africa Reform Partnership. Following that, a meeting has been time-tabled with the Heads of State and Government of the so-called emerging economies, namely Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa. Growth and responsibility in the global economy and climate change will be discussed. The working lunch that rounds off the summit will be dedicated to the most important international organisations. The Secretary General of the UN and the Vice-President of the World Bank, among others, are expected to attend.
Can you believe it (of course you can) Africa policy gets a whole“working dinner” worth of discussion! Bound to end world poverty with that then eh? Is there anyone else out there who finds it somewhat distasteful that so much business will be carried out over food when the focus of the discussion involves millions starving? Has anyone ever had a successful "working" breakfast/lunch/dinner where policy really took primacy??? Answers on a postcard please
Also, while asking difficult questions, here's one. How do we find out whether any of the food consumed at the G8 summit is FAIR TRADE food. I'd love to know!!!! Really, let's think about how we can find this out!
Saturday, June 02, 2007
The world can't wait for the G8
In the same vein as the last post - reminding all that this week is the week of 2007 G8. It's time for everyone to think about what has changed since we all committed to make poverty history 2 years ago. The big nations are committing a couple of days to talking. Can we do better?
My main interest is trade justice rather than climate change, but basically, I'm sure everyone has some feeling that things ain't right in the world and that each of us could and should be doing SOMETHING to try and improve the situation.
This week my projectjam blog (access via www.projectjam.co.uk) is going to focus on G8 and it's impact throughout the world. Check it out. And take the challenge in accordance with Che's statement that "words that do not match deeds are unimportant" and see what you can DO yes, really do to try and make some form of a difference. It would be nice if folks would post up things they do on compost heap maybe? Strength in unity. We may all have different focuses and different ways of activism, but surely we can share and learn.
I recommend the following couple of sites if you want to find a place to start to learn more about G8 matters:
Oxfam http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_you_can_do/campaign/g8/index.htm
and
G8 official site http://www.g-8.de/Webs/G8/EN/Homepage/home.html
Good activism folks... let's stir that compost!
My main interest is trade justice rather than climate change, but basically, I'm sure everyone has some feeling that things ain't right in the world and that each of us could and should be doing SOMETHING to try and improve the situation.
This week my projectjam blog (access via www.projectjam.co.uk) is going to focus on G8 and it's impact throughout the world. Check it out. And take the challenge in accordance with Che's statement that "words that do not match deeds are unimportant" and see what you can DO yes, really do to try and make some form of a difference. It would be nice if folks would post up things they do on compost heap maybe? Strength in unity. We may all have different focuses and different ways of activism, but surely we can share and learn.
I recommend the following couple of sites if you want to find a place to start to learn more about G8 matters:
Oxfam http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_you_can_do/campaign/g8/index.htm
and
G8 official site http://www.g-8.de/Webs/G8/EN/Homepage/home.html
Good activism folks... let's stir that compost!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
