Monday, October 15, 2007

Interview with Chris Hasling from Home Recycling Ltd


How old are you?
40

What’s your occupation and who do you work for?
Managing Director, packer, sales manager, clerk, child minder for Home Recycling Ltd

How long have been doing this?
4 years

What’s the best bit about your job?
Loads of things!
Customers – only lovely people seem to want recycling bins. We don't deliver many orders ourselves now but when we do we are invariably invited in for a chat – I spent 2 hours at a drop once up in Richmondshire sharing a great dinner looking over the valley by the customers farmhouse.

Being able to make own decisions and carry as much stock as we want.

The building we work in is fantastic and full of natural light and great views of the Sowerby Bridge canal basin.

Not wasting time stuck in a car – we all either walk or catch bus to work and tend to brainstorm in the pub afterwards and watch the traffic crawl by

What’s the worst thing?
Always thinking about work but I used to do that when working for other people so at least it's more positive now

What have the last 12 months been like for you?
Massive! Had a new daughter Tess come on the scene – we all live below the warehouse so she has a constant impact on all of us. Saw employee number go from two to six. Doubled the range of recycling bins we stock and tripled turnover

What were you doing before?
Working for JCB Excavators in Barbados

What was your very first full-time job?
Hod carrier

Have you got any plans for the next 12 months you’d like to share with us?
Excavate cellar under building so we can have more storage and living space

What do you do to relax?
Cryptic crossword, a cider and a cigar

Who do you live with?
Wife Tania and daughters Nina 19 months and Tessa 6 months

Whereabouts do you live?
Sowerby Bridge, West Yorkshire

If you were Prime Minister, what’s the very first thing you do?
Close all the airports and takeover tv and radio stations

Have you got any guilty carbon secrets?
Fly once a year

What have you done that you were most proud of?
Been the father of two beautiful girls.

What are you most concerned about in the world at large?
Rising sea levels and the corresponding fight for resources

Which person in the public eye do you most admire and why?
I don't pretend to know anyone well enough in the public eye to admire them

What advice would you give to someone wishing to embark on the same sort of work as you?
Do it for both financial and ethical reasons. You're not doing anyone any favours by getting into it if you're not going to be any good and not going to enjoy it either. People in ethical business who cannot work in a businesslike way and business greenwashers make me fume in equal measure.

What's your website address?
www.homerecycling.co.uk

Thursday, October 04, 2007

A Global Demonstration on Climate Change

Saturday December 8th 2007

On December 8th, the Saturday midway through the all-important UN climate Talks in Bali, there will be demonstrations all around the world calling for urgent action on climate from world leaders.

On the Global Day of Action at the time of the Nairobi Talks on November 4th last year, there were events in over 30 countries - with 90,000 around Australia, 25,000+ at the I-count Rally in Trafalgar square, London and thousands in France, Kenya, Bolivia etc... This year we are looking forward to more and bigger demonstrations around the world. See www.globalclimatecampaign.org

The London demo on December 8th assembles at 12 noon, at Millbank (Westminster tube). We will demand an effective Climate Bill from the UK government and that the US accept binding targets in a fit-for–purpose international climate treaty, to succeed Kyoto. Speakers will include Ming Campbell MP, Michael Meacher MP, Caroline Lucas MEP, Zac Goldsmith and George Monbiot. See www.campaigncc.org.

Come along and join people all around the world to demand that world leaders act now to prevent the catastrophe that threatens to engulf us all !

Carbon Offsetting - A smoke-screen against action to cut emissions

The promotion of carbon offsetting schemes is discouraging individuals, industry and governments from taking action to cut greenhouse gases Friends of the Earth said today. The warning comes as the UK Government prepares to unveil (on Thursday) standards for "offsetting" schemes which claim to neutralise the environmental impact of greenhouse gas emissions.

Friends of the Earth director, Tony Juniper said:

“Carbon offsetting schemes are being used as a smokescreen to avoid real measures to tackle climate change. We urgently need to cut our emissions, but offsetting schemes encourage individuals, businesses and governments to avoid action and carry on polluting. There is still time to act, but we cannot afford to be distracted by measures that at best only have a small role to play in providing the solutions to global warming.”

“Carbon offsetting should be a measure of last resort, after steps have been taken to cut emissions. The Government has a role to play in ensuring that offsetting schemes are genuine. But its main role must be to ensure that UK emissions are cut. This is why its proposed new climate change law must commit the UK to making annual cuts in it's carbon dioxide emissions.”

Briefing - Carbon offsetting

What is it and how does it work?

The principle behind carbon offsetting is that the carbon emissions generated through an activity (such as driving or flying) are calculated and someone is then paid for an initiative that reduces carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by an equivalent amount.

Initiatives that can generate carbon offsets include energy efficiency projects (e.g. installing energy saving technologies in housing developments), renewable energy schemes (e.g. wind farms) or tree-planting schemes which can take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Often these schemes are in developing countries.

What does Friends of the Earth think about carbon offsetting?

Friends of the Earth, does not recommend carbon offsetting for a number of reasons.

Carbon offsetting is being promoted as a relatively pain-free way of tackling climate change. A growing number of schemes now exist which claim that carbon-conscious individuals and businesses can compensate for the carbon emissions released by their activities by donating to various `green' projects from tree planting to renewable energy schemes in the developing world.

Friends of the Earth, along with a number of other organisations, is becoming increasingly concerned that carbon offsetting is being used as a smoke-screen to ward off legislation and delay the urgent action needed to cut emissions and develop alternative low-carbon solutions. Offsets can even encourage businesses and people to continue with (or even increase) unnecessary polluting activities, promoting the mindset `I've offset so it's OK to fly', `I've offset so it's alright to drive to work' etc.

But buying offsets is not, as some would like us to believe, a `magic bullet' to prevent further climate change or a solution to the growth in emissions.

Friends of the Earth's concerns include the following:

We no longer have the luxury of living energy wasteful lifestyles in wealthy countries while using our money to reduce emissions overseas. This is the clear conclusion from scientists, who are urging dramatic reductions in greenhouse gases if we are to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The rich world needs to reduce its emissions substantially and fast (in the UK by as much as 70% by 2030) help developing countries develop clean low carbon technologies (and cope with the unavoidable impacts of climate change). It is no longer one or the other - we need to do both.

Offsetting infers a way to carry on with the polluting activity because you can buy your way out of the problem. We need to urgently shift towards a low carbon economy. Ultimately there is no solution to climate change other than to emit less pollution. The longer we delay action on actually cutting emissions, the worse the problem gets and the harder it will be to cut them later on (so for example, in the UK, if we offset CO2 from flights but continue to promote growth in aviation infrastructure, it will be harder to cut emissions later on when the runways have been built).

Individuals and organisations that are considering cutting emissions may be encouraged not to bother - because they can offset instead.

There are strong concerns over the environmental credibility of many of the credits and the contribution of the projects to sustainable development. Money for an offset scheme should only be funnelled to projects that would not have happened unless the offset money was provided.

Other potential problems such as uncertainties over the carbon accounting; lack of verification of the schemes and a danger that projects can be imposed on developing country communities with no consultation.

Tree-planting schemes are particularly problematic and should be ruled out of any offset scheme. Large scale plantations have decreased biodiversity, displaced people and caused social disruption. Doubts have recently been cast on the contribution of trees outside the tropics in reducing CO2 levels and the science is uncertain.

Friends of the Earth believes that we should campaign for measures that cut emissions such as rules and regulations and incentives to make it cheaper and easier for everyone to do the right thing by the climate.

Government action - creating a low carbon economy

Government can influence behaviour at both the individual and corporate level by sending clear signals about what we need to do. That's why we're campaigning through The Big Ask climate campaign for the UK Government to introduce a strong climate change law which commits the UK to making annual reductions in the UK's carbon emissions across all sections of society (homes, transport, business, industry etc), creating the framework necessary to allow the solutions to climate change to flourish, i.e. clean energy, well designed cars, a 21st century public transport system, help for people to make their homes thermally efficient, technological and financial assistance to developing countries. A strong law would allow the UK to do its fair share of cutting global emissions and would set an example the rest of the world could follow.

For companies to invest in new carbon-saving products they need to be confident that the Government is determined to move towards a low-carbon economy. The greater certainty that would arise from setting annual targets for CO2 cuts would help achieve this. This would encourage businesses and individuals to reduce emissions at source as much as is practically possible by looking at energy conservation and efficiency measures (e.g. using greener fuels, energy provider etc). The problem with carbon offsetting is that it makes it harder to persuade people to actually reduce their emissions at source. We need to fly less, buy less, regulate polluters and support communities affected by pollution and climate change.

What does Friends of the Earth recommend?

The priority must be for governments, businesses and individuals to do all they practically can to cut down or avoid carbon emissions (before considering the purchase of offsets). In addition

If you believe, like Friends of the Earth does, that governments have the major role in fighting climate change then you can take action with us (or support us financially)

You can support practical projects which help the poorer country communities get access to safe, clean renewable energy and adapt to the impacts of climate change that are now unavoidable. (In most cases this will not compensate for your emissions as it is simply providing renewable energy to those people who had no access to energy before). If you want to help with these kinds of projects you can support well known charities, such as Practical Action or Christian Aid, or you can contact one of the responsible carbon offset companies and ask to fund a Gold Standard project (a standard which ensures the project is genuine and really delivers useful benefits).

Friends of the Earth recommends you only consider buying offsets as a last resort (after comprehensive measures to avoid and cut emissions across activities). Because there is a small role to play for offsetting schemes, these need to be properly regulated.

FOE Contact details:

Media Team
Friends of the Earth
26-28 Underwood St.
LONDON
N1 7JQ

Monday, August 06, 2007

New website launched for green and ethical competitions and giveaways

If you like free things but care about the planet then this is the website for you.

Packed with gorgeous, green giveaways and cool, ethical competitions, Ethical Goodies has been launched recently as a single online venue where organisations and businesses could post their competitions and free draws.

Recently reviewed in the Guardian, a visit to the site can currently net you a £500 voucher for a holiday courtesy of the Natural Collection, a rotary mobile phone charger from Lake Renewables, over £300 worth of beauty booty from Style Will Save Us, and many other goodies.

At the time of writing, there were 28 different competitions and giveaways on the site so there should be something that will interest you.

For businesses there's good news too as Ethical Goodies do not charge to list competitions or giveaways!

www.ethicalgoodies.co.uk

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Wasted Energy - Mutual Frustrations

By Peter Hale of Climate Concern UK

I know some say we should think positively and avoid "No", but those of us trying to do our bit to save energy might as well feel some togetherness in our frustration at other people's lack of concern, instead of suffering alone!
OK, we mustn't spoil everybody's fun and I remain guilty myself of driving too many miles, but below are other examples of high energy consumption which work against our own individual efforts and currently bother me!: (send me your own frustrations to circulate).

Hot shops and supermarkets: (not to mention overheated offices, schools and hotels). My number one long-standing frustration. Why do they think they need to heat stores in the winter to the temperature of our front rooms, when we enter wearing coats and move around? Their staff can wear fleeces. And apart from wasting energy and making the fridges all work harder, it must reduce the life of all the food products. I have commented to some of the large store Energy Managers - at least Tesco say they have reduced their target from 21C to 19C.

Water jet pressure washers: A neighbour was out recently jetting every square inch of his long concrete drive, in several sessions for hours at a time - surely a great waste of water and energy. And I spoke to a chap the other day who cleans drives in this way for other people as a business. Is all this concrete cleaning necessary?!

Extra-cold drinks: or "the coldest beer in town". This energy guzzling trend, strongly marketed by the breweries, is especially galling to me because beer (bitter) as I like it - a bit warm - is now virtually unobtainable. And it's supposed to be an English trait!

Over-cooled trains: It is common to experience uncomfortably cold coaches on modern multiple-unit trains, along with cold draughts from overhead. (Express trains, such as GNER and Virgin, seem to operate at comfortable temperatures). The air conditioning to achieve these excessively low temperatures represents an enormous waste of energy. It appears that individual drivers control the cooling - there needs to be a higher minimum limit set. I am currently trying, with difficulty, to make contact with the right people at the train operators. Anybody on a rail users' focus group?

Excessive Business Travel: I spoke to a woman employee of "Candy King" pick-and-mix sweets, who was in the process of filling a stand at Sainsbury's in my local town of Northallerton, north of York. She was visiting just two stores that day, having driven from her home in Lancashire - the other side of the country. When I suggested that the 200 mile return trip seemed a bit out of proportion, her reply was "Oh, I enjoy it". No wonder pick-and-mix are expensive!

Motorhomes: I spoke with a couple the other day who turned up in their little "Smart" car - I thought: "perhaps they're eco-minded". They then mentioned that its main purpose is to be towed around Europe on a trailer behind their motorhome - which does 17 mpg! (There are apparently motorhome shows and gatherings - some with entertainments - all over the country and Europe). The husband turned out to be a well-informed climate sceptic with all the arguments. (Incidentally, I don't recall ever having come across a sceptic who believes it is more likely that global warming isn't caused by our emissions - they always know that it isn't!).

Sports travel excesses: I'm not anti-sport and follow football a bit myself, but we seem to hear little about the extreme travel involved in sports events, some of it avoidable - e.g. a football final held three years ago in Manchester between two Italian clubs! A Leeds United supporter said on the radio that he regularly drives 440 miles return from the south to see home matches. I have spoken with people at two of the clubs claiming to be green, e.g. planning wind turbines - Manchester City and Middlesbrough - they didn't have much to say when I asked if there were efforts to get more fans out of their cars and into coaches.

Freezer temperatures: My own father mentioned that his chest freezer in the garage is set at -30C! And that he doesn't de-frost it. How many fridges and freezers are set far too low out of ignorance of suitable settings? The normally recommended temperatures are: fridge 0C to +3C; freezer -16C to -18C. Thermometers are available at kitchen/DIY stores (ours from Homebase).

Digital Radio on TV: Apparently, millions of people listen to the radio through their power-hungry digital televisions. The power consumption of a modern TV when switched on for radio reception is approx 120 Watts. A typical digital radio takes 8 Watts; a conventional radio 2 Watts!

Truckfests: I keep seeing signs around the country for these - what on earth?!

Exhibitions/Shows: When attending regional exhibitions and hobby-type shows, I am struck by the distances some people travel, not only to visit, but also to take and fetch back exhibits before and after the show, some of them to my mind very minor items. But now perhaps I'm going too far - I've done the same myself!
I'd better stop.

Climate Concern UK
tel 01325 378452
www.climate-concern.com
www.climate-speakers.org.uk